Knowledge transfer plan
Pass critical knowledge to a successor, on a plan, before the expert leaves.
1 / 16 · Mentor360A big problem, weak preparation
- Only 8% of organizations consistently capture leavers' knowledge
- 16% don't try at all
- Barriers: time, resources and senior leadership support
Source: APQC, 2025.
2 / 16 · Mentor360What leaves with an expert?
When an expert leaves, the organization loses more than a person: intuition, relationships and knowledge of the exceptions go too.
Much of the Apollo program's knowledge was lost with retired engineers (DeLong, T+D 2005).
3 / 16 · Mentor360Explicit and tacit knowledge
| Explicit | Tacit | |
|---|---|---|
| What is it? | Can be written down | Embedded in experience |
| Example | Procedure, specification | Knowing a fault by its sound |
| Transfer | Documents and training | Shared experience, dialogue |
The distinction comes from Nonaka's knowledge creation model.
4 / 16 · Mentor360Step 1: Find the knowledge at risk
- Criticality: what's affected without this knowledge?
- Uniqueness: who else knows it?
- Tacitness: how much is written, how much in their head?
- Timing: when is the expert leaving?
Priority: critical × unique
| Low uniqueness | High uniqueness | |
|---|---|---|
| High criticality | Document, back up | Start here |
| Low criticality | Monitor | Handle in round two |
TechnipFMC treats every departing expert as a separate project (APQC, 2025).
6 / 16 · Mentor360Step 2: Choose the methods
- Shadowing: the successor watches the expert at real work
- Learning by doing: the successor does it, the expert gives feedback
- Decision log: the expert briefly writes down assumptions
- After-action review: plan compared with result
- Relationship handover: joint meetings with key stakeholders
Experience-based expertise grows through guided experience (Leonard and Swap).
7 / 16 · Mentor360Questions that unlock tacit knowledge
- "What's the first thing you look at in this situation?"
- "Can you tell me about a time the rule didn't hold?"
- "What mistake do newcomers make most?"
- "Whose view do you get on this decision?"
The successor reads the answers back in their own words; the expert corrects.
8 / 16 · Mentor360Step 3: A one-page transfer plan
| Knowledge area | Method | Readiness criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Budget negotiation | Shadowing, decision log | Runs one negotiation under supervision |
| Fault diagnosis | Learning by doing | Diagnoses 4 of the last 5 faults |
| Supplier relations | Relationship handover | Key introductions done |
| Quality procedures | Documents, training | Procedures up to date |
Timeline: 9–12 months
| Period | Focus |
|---|---|
| Months 0–1 | Risk assessment, successor, plan approval |
| Months 2–4 | Shadowing, decision log, documentation |
| Months 5–8 | Learning by doing, expert steps back |
| Months 9–12 | Successor independent, closing review |
If time is short, focus on the 2–3 riskiest areas.
10 / 16 · Mentor360Is the successor ready? Four levels
- Has watched, can describe the steps
- Can do it with the expert alongside
- Works independently, consults only on exceptions
- Can teach it and handle the unexpected
The plan is done when most critical areas reach Level 3.
11 / 16 · Mentor360Who does what?
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Expert | Opens up knowledge, observes, gives feedback |
| Successor | Asks, takes notes, applies |
| Manager | Makes time, rates levels separately |
| HR | Tracks the plan, makes contributions visible |
Gaps between ratings show where more work is needed.
12 / 16 · Mentor360No plan works without culture
- Add knowledge transfer to the expert's job description
- Make real time for it in their calendar
- Make the expert's contribution visible and recognize it
- Change the "knowledge is power" mindset in managers first
DeLong notes that competitive cultures weaken this effort.
13 / 16 · Mentor360Exercise: Draft your first plan (15 min)
- List the expert's three critical knowledge areas
- Score each for criticality and uniqueness
- Choose a method for the riskiest area
- Set a target date and a readiness criterion
Have the expert, successor and manager compare results.
14 / 16 · Mentor360Sources
- APQC, 2025 — Great Retirement, knowledge capture rates
- Salopek, T+D, 2005 — DeLong's warnings on risk and culture
- Nonaka — tacit and explicit knowledge model
- Leonard and Swap — Deep Smarts, experience-based expertise
- After-action review — origins of the method
Start the plan this week
Take the first step with one expert, one successor and a one-page plan.
mentor360.com.tr
16 / 16 · Mentor360